<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NetSafe Blog &#187; research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/tag/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz</link>
	<description>Top tips on staying safe online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:44:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>For your homework this week please write about&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/2011/03/15/for-your-homework-this-week-please-write-about/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/2011/03/15/for-your-homework-this-week-please-write-about/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 23:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hails (NetSafe)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/?p=840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should children continue to explore news in the traditional printed form or would they be better equipped for a digital future by researching interesting news reports online?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My son is in year 5 at an Auckland school and lately has been tasked with exploring the world of printed newspapers to find stories that interest him enough to write about or discuss with his class.</p>
<p>As a former newspaper journalist I can&#8217;t help but feel torn over this homework task &#8211; on the one hand it&#8217;s great to see that schools still support the printed word and want primary aged learners to develop information gathering and presentation skills from traditional news sources.</p>
<p>On the other, I can help but gasp at the idea of buying a newspaper simply to cut out a story for school when I now get 100% of my news from online sources, scouring online news websites, Google News and Twitter updates for the latest information on developing stories.</p>
<p>Thinking back to the Christchurch earthquake last month it was more insightful to follow posts against the #eqnz hashtag than it was to wait for website updates &#8211; real time news was being made by witnesses on the ground.</p>
<h2>The web killed my local newspaper</h2>
<p>In the US <a title="The Web (Finally) Surpasses Newspapers As Source for Americans' News" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/milestone_the_web_finally_surpasses_newspapers_as.php" target="_blank">it&#8217;s now a fact that more Americans get their news online</a> than buy printed papers:</p>
<blockquote><p>46% of people now say they get their news online at least three times a week, surpassing newspapers (40%) for the first time</p></blockquote>
<p>This State of the Media report from the Pew Research Center&#8217;s Project for Excellence in Journalism would seem to confirm the trends we now see in young children in full-time education &#8211; screen based activities are often more appealing than traditional classroom activities and &#8220;children have more access to all kinds of digital media, and are spending more time during the day with them than ever before.&#8221;</p>
<p>The quote is from a new report entitled <em><a title="Always Connected: The new digitial media habits of young children" href="http://joanganzcooneycenter.org/Reports-28.html" target="_blank">Always Connected: The new digitial media habits of young children</a> </em>published by<em> </em>The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop and is well worth a read.</p>
<p>As a parent I&#8217;m not recommending that NZ children emulate their American equivalents and <strong>spend about 5.5 hours each day using media</strong><em>. </em>All I would say is that maybe it&#8217;s time to abandon newspapers and teach information gathering skills in a digital environment instead?<em><br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/2011/03/15/for-your-homework-this-week-please-write-about/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;screen media makes you fat, lazy and stupid&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/2010/05/04/screen-media-makes-you-fat-lazy-and-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/2010/05/04/screen-media-makes-you-fat-lazy-and-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hails (NetSafe)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/?p=551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research from around the globe suggests too much TV is bad for you. Should modern educators - and parents - be concerned about the growing use of screen-based technology in classrooms?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That seems to be the general takeway point from <a title="Never let young watch TV: experts" href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10642599&amp;pnum=0" target="_blank">this NZ Herald story reporting the latest Canadian research</a> on the impact of TV on children.</p>
<p>They don&#8217;t of course quite phrase it that way, but reading between the lines and scientific jargon the research undertaken at Montreal University seems to back up a similar New Zealand study on the issue.</p>
<p>The conclusion &#8211; there are:</p>
<blockquote><p>links between watching too much TV in childhood and later problems, including obesity, high cholesterol, poor fitness, smoking, short attention span, poor concentration &#8211; and lower rates of school and university qualifications.</p></blockquote>
<p>Does this mean exposure to screen based media is bad <em>in general</em>? It would appear not &#8211; the article goes on to suggest that &#8220;under-2s should not watch any television and that older children should view no more than two hours a day&#8221;.</p>
<p>Does it give forward thinking educators reason to be concerned if teachers are increasingly making use of computers and other modern screen-based technology in the classroom?</p>
<p>Working &#8211; as I do &#8211; at a pro-technology organisation I would argue no &#8211; moderate use of any new technology is surely the best way to introduce students to the benefits of new developments in education and also in the working world.</p>
<p>I can remember the first time I used a green screen Amstrad &#8216;computer&#8217; at University (many years after my first exposure to BBC Bs, ZX Spectrums and Commodore 64s) and was told that this was how modern newspapers were created.</p>
<p>The move away from lead blocks may have enraged the printing unions but learning how things are done &#8216;at work&#8217; equipped me with a valuable skill that made me employable.</p>
<p>Embracing opportunities to experience technology and learn how it works should surely be viewed as a positive step in education &#8211; where sensible safeguards have been implemented on both health (run round the playground 10 times afterwards) and safety (don&#8217;t reveal personal information online) grounds.</p>
<p>As an example, watch this video below showing how a 2 and a half year old uses the iPad to consume media &#8211; just remember that as with your passion for Moro Golds, moderation is the key to a healthy and happy life.*</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="405" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pT4EbM7dCMs&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="405" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pT4EbM7dCMs&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>*Have no fear, I will not shortly be issuing a new personal development book available at most good booksellers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/2010/05/04/screen-media-makes-you-fat-lazy-and-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effective model for teaching cybersafety to young children</title>
		<link>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/2009/07/16/effective-model-for-teaching-cybersafety-to-young-children/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/2009/07/16/effective-model-for-teaching-cybersafety-to-young-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Cocker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iKeepSafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study of the DARE/iKeepSafe cybersafety programme tells us something we should already know. The classroom is the place to teach - and certain styles of lesson work better than others. Why then do many cybersafety programmes base themselves around websites or assembly based presentations?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People get sick of hearing me lament about how little research there is about the effectiveness of cybersafety education. So its with some excitement that I came across <a href="http://thejournal.com/articles/2009/07/14/study-finds-education-program-effective-in-teaching-kids-about-cyber-safety.aspx">this</a> article about the effectiveness of an <a href="http://www.ikeepsafe.org">iKeepSafe</a> education programme.</p>
<p>To cut a short article shorter. The finding is that the programme of iKeepSafe resources delivered in classrooms by <a href="http://www.dare.org/home/default.asp">DARE</a>officers improves understanding of the &#8216;three keeps&#8217; of internet safety. As an aside, this was the first time I&#8217;d come accross iKeepSafe&#8217;s three keeps concept (keep safe, keep away, and keep telling).</p>
<p>For those of you into that sort of thing, the full report is <a href="http://knowwheretheygo.org/dareevaluation">here</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that the findings are positive. The &#8216;lesson&#8217; is close to best practice as we are coming to understand it. There are four identifiable components contributing to its success.</p>
<p>1) The iKeepSafe resources are fun and engaging. Kids will watch the movies. They provide a great centerpiece to build learning around.</p>
<p>2) The lesson is delivered by an expert. Young people will listen to advice from somebody they believe is an expert.  That&#8217;s a lot easier at 6 years old than at 16. At 6, almost all children believe adults are experts at everything. By 16, no adult knows nothing.</p>
<p>3) The partcipant children are guided in discussion &#8211; as opposed to presented content. This style of lesson gives children the opportunity to discover concepts and evolve their thinking. Its a better style of teaching. Teachers know this already.</p>
<p>4) The lesson is delivered in a classroom. Here&#8217;s a news flash. It turns out that the classroom is a good place to explore and learn new concepts. Kids don&#8217;t learn much in assemblies &#8211; which is why schools don&#8217;t teach in them.  Computer based training can teach some things well (look at the success of  <a href="http://www.mathletics.co.nz/">mathletics</a>for example) but not all things. The reason that cybersafety education based in a classroom facilitated by an expert works  is because its a model of education that works! </p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t be banging out our messages in assemblies &#8211; nor should we try and rely on websites to deliver cybersafety education. If we&#8217;re educating children, then we should use models of education that we know work with children.</p>
<p>Of course the reasearch shows an improvement in identifying strategies to deal with cyber issues. It doesn&#8217;t tell us that they will employ them. However, knowing the strategies is one step closer to being able to implement them. One stat really jumped out at me - the research showed the children who recognised they should tell an adult about another child being cyberbullied rose 77%.  We know that appropriate peer intervention is critical in bullying. That&#8217;s why its a key theme of NetSafe&#8217;s &#8216;At A Distance&#8217; video (which you can view <a href="http://www.cyberbullying.org.nz/youngpeople/">here</a> ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.netsafe.org.nz/2009/07/16/effective-model-for-teaching-cybersafety-to-young-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

